![]() ![]() ![]() However, “M1A2 SEP v2 and v3 overall weight increases with full combat load and trophy APS present transportability and recovery challenges,” the Pentagon’s Chief Weapons Inspector warned in a 2021 report. Early M1A1s weighed around 60 tons, compared to Russia’s 45-ton T-72 and China’s 55-ton Type 99A – but the latest Abrams weighs closer to 80 tons, designed to shoot down incoming anti Caused by upgrades such as the lost Trophy Active Protection System. For AbramsX, the biggest goal was to solve a growing problem with the M1, of which more than 10,000 have been built since 1979.Ībrams has always been a heavy tank. Tank design is a balance – and a tradeoff – between three factors: firepower, protection and maneuverability. “It’s not just a steady performance.” Diet M1 “It drives around, fires, and it performs the functions of a tank,” Tim Reese, director of US business development for General Dynamics Land Systems, told Insider. Nonetheless, the AbramsX is a working weapon. Rather than a next-generation armored vehicle, the AbramsX is more of an interim design to bridge the gap between Cold War-era designs that still comprise the world’s tank fleet, and actual next-generation vehicles that are expected to be built as early as 2050. It began as an internal General Dynamics research project to show how the new technologies could be applied to a new tank or retrofitted to existing tanks. AbramsX is truly a technology demonstrator. Although the media has dubbed the AbramsX the “next generation tank”, it is not quite accurate. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |